Newsfiend
01-29-2010, 02:21 AM
Ronak-Xegony wrote:
His post also showed a great deal of what's wrong with EQ development now. He said that 75% of the bugs they have fixed since UF release were for content not even ingame.
That wasn't all the bugs we've fixed since UF release. It was the most recent 100 marked closed as of the time I was writing the post. It wasn't even a month's worth.
And to address the thread as a whole:
If your source on the future of EverQuest (or any other ongoing product line, honestly) is not someone who is on the company payroll, that source does not have inside information. Period.
If you want to rile yourselves up over rumor and conjecture, feel free to, but we've followed the same pattern of expansion information for years now. We talk about an expansion if and only if it's been officially announced. Citing a "lack of information" as a reason for whatever you're predicting is, well, foolish.
More... (http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=160539&post_id=2387501#2387501)
His post also showed a great deal of what's wrong with EQ development now. He said that 75% of the bugs they have fixed since UF release were for content not even ingame.
That wasn't all the bugs we've fixed since UF release. It was the most recent 100 marked closed as of the time I was writing the post. It wasn't even a month's worth.
And to address the thread as a whole:
If your source on the future of EverQuest (or any other ongoing product line, honestly) is not someone who is on the company payroll, that source does not have inside information. Period.
If you want to rile yourselves up over rumor and conjecture, feel free to, but we've followed the same pattern of expansion information for years now. We talk about an expansion if and only if it's been officially announced. Citing a "lack of information" as a reason for whatever you're predicting is, well, foolish.
More... (http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=160539&post_id=2387501#2387501)