Newsfiend
10-05-2009, 09:06 AM
The damage is intended.
The 2 aug slots were a mistake. We may do a 7 and 8 in the future, but have no plans for a 4 and 8, nor an 8 and 8 on anything that any melee class can use. We might do it for something only casters/priests can use.
the dual slots is so more STATS can be added to the item (which is why a 7 is ok) not more damage.
Or, if we do do a 4+8 or 8+8 it will have 8 *base* damage removed to assume people will try putting 2 damage augs in there.
In this case, we are removing one of the slots (I believe the 4)
More... (http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=155885&post_id=2303835#2303835)
The 2 aug slots were a mistake. We may do a 7 and 8 in the future, but have no plans for a 4 and 8, nor an 8 and 8 on anything that any melee class can use. We might do it for something only casters/priests can use.
the dual slots is so more STATS can be added to the item (which is why a 7 is ok) not more damage.
Or, if we do do a 4+8 or 8+8 it will have 8 *base* damage removed to assume people will try putting 2 damage augs in there.
In this case, we are removing one of the slots (I believe the 4)
More... (http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/posts/list.m?topic_id=155885&post_id=2303835#2303835)